The Best UK Shared Hosting At A Glance
Show companies User come from United States (Change) with a Good reputation
Filter
3
Average / Mixed Provider
Network Solutions Review

Network Solutions United States

Founded in 1979 and was the sole registrar for .com, .net, and .org domains for nearly two decades before the market was opened to competition
Now a core brand under the Newfold Digital conglomerate, sharing corporate leadership and support resources with Web.com and Register.com
Has been the subject of numerous class-action lawsuits over the years regarding its domain 'tasting' and aggressive renewal billing policies
Maintains a massive physical office presence in Jacksonville, Florida, serving as a primary hub for its North American customer advocate teams
Originally developed much of the early infrastructure that defines how the modern Domain Name System (DNS) operates today
Recently integrated advanced AI tools to help legacy users refresh their decades-old websites into more modern mobile-responsive designs
Read more Read less
3
Average / Mixed Provider
iPage Review

iPage United States

Founded in 1998 and has grown to serve over 1 million customers globally, though it has undergone multiple ownership changes since its inception
Now acts as a consolidation brand for Newfold Digital, having absorbed customers from sister brands like FatCow, Dot5, and PowWeb over recent years
Utilizes its own proprietary vDeck control panel alongside standard cPanel, which was designed to be a simpler alternative for non-technical users
Has been the subject of numerous public complaints regarding the 'selling' of customer phone numbers to third-party marketing firms post-signup
Maintains a massive offshore support operation in the Philippines to manage its high volume of budget-segment technical inquiries 24 hours a day
Offers a unique 'SiteLock' security integration that is frequently pushed as a mandatory paid add-on during the checkout process for shared hosting
Read more Read less
3
Average / Mixed Provider
EasySpace Review

EasySpace United States

This rating uses a conservative baseline because trustworthy public data is scarce.
2.5
Average / Mixed Provider
Hostry Review

Hostry United States

Headquartered in Limassol, Cyprus, and markets itself as a global 'multi-cloud' aggregator rather than a traditional hosting provider
Partners with several Tier 1 network providers including Hibernia Networks and Cogent to deliver its Content Delivery Network (CDN) services
Has been accused in multiple public forums of being a 'ghost' provider with operational roots in Eastern Europe despite its Cyprus registration
Maintains an official server status page that users claim is frequently inaccurate and does not reflect actual regional downtimes
Offers a 'Free VPS' tier which is notoriously difficult to claim and often used as a marketing tool to upsell unstable paid services
Utilizes top-class hardware brands like Dell and Supermicro in its primary data centers to offset its otherwise low-service reputation
Read more Read less
2.5
Average / Mixed Provider
Hostwinds Review

Hostwinds United States

Founded in 2010 by Peter Holden in Seattle, Washington, and has maintained its status as an independent privately-held provider amidst industry consolidation
Utilizes a unique server-naming convention with cute mascots (dragons, dinosaurs, aliens) to contrast its highly technical infrastructure focus
Operates its own data center facilities in Seattle, Dallas, and Amsterdam, giving them total control over the physical network and hardware layers
Implements a strictly automated suspension policy for failed payments, which has been a point of significant friction for international business owners
Has a rare 4.8 internal support rating for 'Guru-level' assistance, yet faces a polarized external reputation due to its rigid billing and refund policies
One of the few providers that still offers a 'Managed' service layer for both Linux and Windows VPS at relatively affordable budget price points
Read more Read less
2.4
Average / Mixed Provider
IPOWER Review

IPOWER United States

Founded in 2001 and was once a respected leader in the budget hosting segment before being acquired by Endurance International Group (now Newfold Digital)
Operating roots are in Phoenix, Arizona, though most of its technical support and back-office operations have since been outsourced to the Philippines
One of the few remaining major hosts still offering the legacy vDeck control panel alongside the more modern industry-standard cPanel
Has faced multiple public allegations of 'professional thievery' regarding its refusal to issue refunds even on the same day as an unauthorized renewal
Markets a specialized 'WordPress Hosting' plan that users claim is actually just standard shared hosting with a pre-installed WordPress core
Known for its 'green' marketing claims, though specific data on their current renewable energy usage is less transparent than competitors like HostPapa
Read more Read less
2.1
Average / Mixed Provider
FatCow Review

FatCow United States

Founded in 1998 and remains one of the oldest brands under the Newfold Digital (formerly EIG) umbrella, sharing resources with iPage and Bluehost
Utilizes the legacy vDeck control panel, a competitor to cPanel that has largely disappeared from the modern web hosting market
Has a long-standing association with 'Green Hosting' by purchasing Wind Energy Credits (RECs) to offset its data center electricity consumption by 200 percent
Was one of the first major hosts to bundle Weebly directly into its entry-level plans to compete with emerging standalone website builder platforms
Operational and technical support teams have been almost entirely transitioned to offshore locations post-acquisition, specifically targeting the Philippines
Maintains a unique 'Heifer International' partnership where they have historically donated to provide cows and support to families in developing nations
Read more Read less

* TrustHostReview publishes professional hosting reviews with full editorial independence. We use the same transparent standards for every provider. Sometimes we may receive compensation from companies listed here, but it never influences our testing, conclusions, or rankings. Any compensation simply helps cover operating costs like account purchases, testing, and reviewer royalties.